-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes API breaking changes. #557
Fixes API breaking changes. #557
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
3339b0e
to
bd3bbaa
Compare
046f466
to
55fd6a0
Compare
@THS-on Did you have the time to check if changes would have any effect on the RSA 2048 keys? |
@@ -228,8 +230,36 @@ pub fn load_ak( | |||
Ok(key_handle) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/// This creates an Attestation Key in the Endorsement hierarchy | |||
/// This creates an Attestation Key in the Endorsement hierarchy. | |||
pub fn create_ak<IKC: IntoKeyCustomization>( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it'd be good to mark one of them as #[deprecated]
with a message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about that. The problem is that the function will not be removed but it will have its arguments changed in the next major version.
So xx will have its arguments changed.
and xx_2 will be removed. So xx_2 is the function that we want people to use right now. But it will be removed so marking it deprecated here could cause a lot of confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, so let's not do that. But a doc-comment WARNING note or something may still be a good idea? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is an excellent idea. I need to rephrase the comments any way because I could barely understand them my self when I tried to look at the code in the browser.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I have managed to fix it now. Please have a last look at the comments so I have not made some embarrassing mistakes @wiktor-k @ionut-arm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it looks really nice 👌
55fd6a0
to
0d7c815
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jesper Brynolf <[email protected]>
0d7c815
to
5590896
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!!
This is an attempt to avoid breaking the API in major version 7.