Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarifying Team Collectives #452

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jamesaross
Copy link
Contributor

Some descriptions of collective routines did not specify support for OpenSHMEM teams, but rather only active sets. These changes clarify that they support both teams and active sets (now deprecated).

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
\apisummary{
The following functions perform reduction operations across all
\acp{PE} in a set of \acp{PE}.
\acp{PE} in an \openshmem team or active set of \acp{PE}.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would the sentence read better if we dropped "of \acp{PE}"?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also suggest dropping "of PEs" in the subsequent occurrences.

@jdinan
Copy link
Collaborator

jdinan commented Aug 22, 2024

@davidozog Could you please review this PR to see if the collectives section committee would like to incorporate these changes?

@davidozog
Copy link
Collaborator

Most all these changes are apparently now covered by #511, but perhaps we should check with @kwaters4 before closing this PR.

@kwaters4 - the changes on this PR in shmem_reductions.tex are not in #511, but I think "a set of PEs" might be ok in that context... Otherwise, it looks like #511 can supplants the changes here, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

@davidozog
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed by davidozog#8

@davidozog davidozog closed this Aug 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Status: Collectives (Sec. 9.10)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants