Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 3 NuGet dependencies #366

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Dec 23, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.ePaper from 1.0.532 to 1.0.547
Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated dependencies for improved functionality across multiple projects, including nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886.
    • Enhanced support for nanoFramework.Iot.Device.ePaper with a version update.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Version increments may include bug fixes or enhancements for the updated dependencies.

Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704</br>Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.ePaper from 1.0.532 to 1.0.547</br>Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves updating dependency versions across multiple packages.lock.json files in various nanoFramework projects. The primary updates are to the nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 dependencies, with versions incrementing from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704. Additionally, the nanoFramework.Iot.Device.ePaper dependency in the nanoFramework.CoreInk project was updated from 1.0.532 to 1.0.547. These updates appear to be part of a coordinated dependency version upgrade across different nanoFramework project configurations.

Changes

File Change Summary
Tests/FireTestApp/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
Tests/M5Core2TestApp/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
Tests/M5CoreTestApp/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
Tests/M5StickTestApp/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
nanoFramework.CoreInk/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.ePaper from 1.0.532 to 1.0.547
nanoFramework.Fire/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
nanoFramework.M5Core/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
nanoFramework.M5Core2/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
nanoFramework.M5StickC/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704
nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

CI: Publish Release

Suggested reviewers

  • AdrianSoundy

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c7b8b9 and bda8657.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (29)
  • Tests/FireTestApp/FireTestApp.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/FireTestApp/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/M5Core2TestApp/M5Core2TestApp.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/M5Core2TestApp/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/M5CoreTestApp/M5CoreTestApp.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/M5CoreTestApp/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/M5StickTestApp/M5StickTestApp.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • Tests/M5StickTestApp/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.AtomMatrix.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/nanoFramework.AtomMatrix.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.CoreInk.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.CoreInk/nanoFramework.CoreInk.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.CoreInk/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.Fire.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.Fire/nanoFramework.Fire.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.Fire/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5Core.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5Core/nanoFramework.M5Core.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5Core/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5Core2.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5Core2/nanoFramework.M5Core2.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5Core2/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5StickC.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5StickC/nanoFramework.M5StickC.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5StickC/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus/nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • Tests/FireTestApp/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
  • Tests/M5Core2TestApp/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
  • Tests/M5CoreTestApp/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
  • Tests/M5StickTestApp/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.CoreInk/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.Fire/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.M5Core/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.M5Core2/packages.lock.json (2 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.M5StickC/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/packages.lock.json (1)

37-39: LGTM! Verify compatibility with the updated Mpu6886 package.

The version update from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704 is consistent with the PR objectives. Since this is a patch version update, it should only contain backwards-compatible bug fixes.

✅ Verification successful

The package update from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704 appears safe to proceed.

The codebase uses the Mpu6886 package in a straightforward manner, primarily through the Mpu6886AccelerometerGyroscope class with standard initialization. The usage is consistent across all implementations:

  • AtomMatrix: Basic initialization with default I2C address (0x68)
  • M5CoreBase: Same pattern with default I2C configuration
  • M5StickCBase: Similar implementation using default I2C address

Since the usage is limited to basic initialization and the standard AccelerometerGyroscope property, and given this is a patch version update (1.2.x), the changes are likely to be backward-compatible bug fixes that won't impact the existing functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the Mpu6886 package changelog between versions

# Fetch the changelog or release notes for the specific versions
gh release view --repo nanoframework/nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 v1.2.704

Length of output: 200


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find any references or usage of the Mpu6886 package in the codebase
# This will help us understand the impact of the update

# Search for files containing Mpu6886 references
rg -l "Mpu6886" 

# Search for specific usage patterns of Mpu6886
ast-grep --pattern 'using Iot.Device.Mpu6886'

Length of output: 1932


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of Mpu6886 in the source files to understand the API usage
# This will help determine if there might be compatibility concerns

# Check AtomMatrix.cs implementation
cat nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/AtomMatrix.cs

# Check M5CoreBase.cs implementation
cat nanoFramework.M5StackCore/M5CoreBase.cs

# Check M5StickCBase.cs implementation
cat nanoFramework.M5StickCommon/M5StickCBase.cs

Length of output: 17552

nanoFramework.CoreInk/packages.lock.json (1)

43-45: LGTM! Verify compatibility with the updated ePaper package.

The version update from 1.0.532 to 1.0.547 is consistent with the PR objectives. Since this is a patch version update, it should only contain backwards-compatible bug fixes.

✅ Verification successful

The package update appears safe to proceed

The code uses only the Gdew0154m09 class from the Iot.Device.EPaper.Drivers.Jd796xx namespace, and the usage is straightforward with standard initialization parameters. The implementation relies on basic SPI communication and GPIO pins, which are fundamental features unlikely to change in a patch version update. The version bump from 1.0.532 to 1.0.547 follows semantic versioning principles, indicating only backwards-compatible changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the ePaper package changelog between versions

# Fetch the changelog or release notes for the specific versions
gh release view --repo nanoframework/nanoFramework.Iot.Device.ePaper v1.0.547

Length of output: 198


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find any breaking changes by examining the dependencies and usage patterns

# First, let's check if there are any direct usages of the ePaper package
rg -l "Iot\.Device\.ePaper" --type-add 'csproj:*.{csproj,cs}'  --type csproj

# Look for any specific ePaper related class usages
rg "EPaper|EInk|EPD" --type cs -A 2

# Check the project file for dependency information
fd -e csproj -x cat {}

Length of output: 346


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the specific usage of the ePaper package in M5CoreInk.cs
cat nanoFramework.CoreInk/M5CoreInk.cs

Length of output: 7576

Tests/M5StickTestApp/packages.lock.json (1)

49-51: LGTM! Version update is consistent.

The version update from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704 matches the update in nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/packages.lock.json, maintaining consistency across the repository.

Tests/M5CoreTestApp/packages.lock.json (2)

19-21: LGTM: Version update for Bmm150 package

The update of nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 to version 1.2.704 is consistent with the PR objectives.


37-39: LGTM: Version update for Mpu6886 package

The update of nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 to version 1.2.704 is consistent with the PR objectives.

nanoFramework.M5StickCPlus/packages.lock.json (1)

55-57: LGTM: Version update for Mpu6886 package

The update of nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 to version 1.2.704 is consistent with the PR objectives.

Let's verify the location of the ePaper package update mentioned in the PR objectives:

Tests/FireTestApp/packages.lock.json (1)

31-33: LGTM! Version updates are consistent.

The dependency updates for both packages match the PR objectives:

  • nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150: 1.2.696 -> 1.2.704
  • nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886: 1.2.696 -> 1.2.704

Also applies to: 55-57

nanoFramework.M5Core/packages.lock.json (1)

25-27: LGTM! Version updates are consistent.

The dependency updates for both packages match the PR objectives:

  • nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150: 1.2.696 -> 1.2.704
  • nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886: 1.2.696 -> 1.2.704

Also applies to: 49-51

nanoFramework.Fire/packages.lock.json (1)

37-39: LGTM! Version updates are consistent.

The dependency updates for both packages match the PR objectives:

  • nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150: 1.2.696 -> 1.2.704
  • nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886: 1.2.696 -> 1.2.704

Let's verify if there are any breaking changes in the updated versions:

Also applies to: 61-63

✅ Verification successful

Version updates appear safe to proceed

Based on the code analysis:

  • Both Bmm150 and Mpu6886 are used as simple I2C devices with standard initialization
  • The usage is consistent across files and follows a basic pattern of device instantiation
  • No complex API usage or custom configurations that might be affected by version changes
  • The version change (1.2.696 -> 1.2.704) is a minor update, suggesting backward compatibility

Since these are IoT device drivers following standard I2C communication patterns and the version change is minor, the update is likely safe. The code shows straightforward usage patterns that are unlikely to be affected by breaking changes in such a minor version increment.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the updated packages

# Check the changelog or release notes for the updated packages
gh api repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("v1.2.704")) | .body'

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for changes between versions

# First, let's check the git history for changes in the relevant device files
rg -l "Bmm150|Mpu6886" --type cs

# Then check the commit history between the versions
gh api repos/nanoframework/nanoFramework.IoT.Device/commits | jq -r '.[] | select(.commit.message | contains("1.2.704") or contains("1.2.696")) | .commit.message'

Length of output: 322


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of these dependencies in the codebase

# Check how these sensors are used in the found files
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Bmm150|Mpu6886" nanoFramework.M5StickCommon/M5StickCBase.cs nanoFramework.M5StackCore/M5CoreBase.cs nanoFramework.AtomMatrix/AtomMatrix.cs

# Also check if there are any breaking changes in the API
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  public $_($$$) {
    $$$
    new Bmm150($$$)
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  public $_($$$) {
    $$$
    new Mpu6886($$$)
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 8615

Tests/M5Core2TestApp/packages.lock.json (1)

31-33: LGTM: Dependency versions updated correctly

The version updates for both nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704 are consistent with the PR objectives.

Also applies to: 49-51

nanoFramework.M5Core2/packages.lock.json (1)

37-39: LGTM: Dependency versions updated correctly

The version updates for both nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Bmm150 and nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704 are consistent with the PR objectives and match the updates in the test project.

Also applies to: 61-63

nanoFramework.M5StickC/packages.lock.json (1)

49-51: LGTM! Version update looks correct.

The package version update for nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 from 1.2.696 to 1.2.704 is consistent with the PR objectives and follows semantic versioning guidelines.

Let's verify version consistency across the repository:

✅ Verification successful

Version consistency verified across all package lock files

All instances of nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886 package in the repository's package lock files are consistently set to version 1.2.704, confirming that the update has been applied uniformly across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Mpu6886 package version consistency across all packages.lock.json files

# Find all packages.lock.json files and check for Mpu6886 versions
fd 'packages\.lock\.json$' --exec grep -A 2 '"nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Mpu6886"' {} \;

Length of output: 1221


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 868db66 into main Dec 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/a07309c1-c42a-44dc-8bc3-4aa0905271b5 branch December 23, 2024 07:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant