-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 517
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BUG] Fix duplicate policy creation bug & dynamic group compliance #5536
Open
AlfredSchreuder
wants to merge
10
commits into
microsoft:Dev
Choose a base branch
from
AlfredSchreuder:Dev
base: Dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cdcbbd5
Fix policy creation bug
e9b867e
Fix dynamic group compliance check & added DOCS
ce951f9
Merge branch 'Dev' into Dev
ykuijs 67dd4bb
Update Modules/Microsoft365DSC/DSCResources/MSFT_IntuneAccountProtect…
AlfredSchreuder d21970e
Update MSFT_IntuneSettingCatalogASRRulesPolicyWindows10.psm1
AlfredSchreuder e91cf86
Update MSFT_IntuneAccountProtectionLocalAdministratorPasswordSolution…
AlfredSchreuder 075a188
Update MSFT_IntuneAccountProtectionPolicyWindows10.psm1
AlfredSchreuder 8cfff93
Update MSFT_IntuneAntivirusPolicyLinux.psm1
AlfredSchreuder 6d8a9be
Capital I
d2649e5
Update verbose messages
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this even necessary? Now there is two times the same block:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As cases described in the below comment, I believe it is usefull because it are 2 different cases. The code used to result in described cases is integrated from the MSFT_AADConditionalAccessPolicy which had the behaviour that this policies lacked.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still believe that only the if check should be added to the modules and not really other changes. I'll check some things and report back.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually this block that is present 2 times handles the cases where multiple policies are present with the same Name. This was not present in the old code. Maybe the If statement was enough to handle the other cases, I don't know, I copied/used/integrated working code to make these policies show the expected behaviour.