feat: github pr search #16
Conversation
WalkthroughThe project has expanded to integrate with a new service called "Aperture," and the GitHub-related code has been refactored to broaden its scope beyond contributors to include pull request data. New functions have been added to handle pull request searches and retrieval, with updates to the testing framework to accommodate these changes. A specific test has been temporarily excluded from the suite. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 5
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (1)
- package.json
Files selected for processing (6)
- ENV_SAMPLE (1 hunks)
- github.js (2 hunks)
- index.js (1 hunks)
- test/fixtures/pullRequests.fixture.js (1 hunks)
- test/github.test.js (3 hunks)
- test/index.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- test/fixtures/pullRequests.fixture.js
Additional comments: 8
ENV_SAMPLE (1)
- 2-4: The addition of new environment variables
APERTURE_SERVICE_ADDRESSandAPERTURE_API_KEYis consistent with the PR's objective to integrate with an external service named "Aperture." Ensure that documentation and any code that consumes these variables are updated accordingly.github.js (1)
- 210-264: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-264]
Please verify that the new environment variables
APERTURE_SERVICE_ADDRESSandAPERTURE_API_KEYare correctly used throughout the codebase and that their addition to theENV_SAMPLEfile is properly documented.index.js (1)
- 1-1: The import statement has been updated correctly to reflect the new filename
github.js. Ensure that all references tocontributorsLibwithin the file are updated if the exported members fromgithub.jshave changed.test/github.test.js (4)
2-2: Import statement updated to reflect the new module name, which aligns with the expanded functionality.
7-7: The
describeblock has been renamed to match the updated module name and functionality.11-11: The test cases related to contributors are skipped. Verify if this is intentional and ensure there's documentation or comments explaining why these tests are skipped.
Also applies to: 22-22, 33-33
- 44-56: New test cases added for the pull request search functionality, which aligns with the new features introduced in the PR.
Also applies to: 58-69
test/index.test.js (1)
- 12-12: इस परिवर्तन के कारणों की पुष्टि करें। यदि यह अस्थायी है, तो भविष्य में इन परीक्षणों को फिर से सक्रिय करने की योजना सुनिश्चित करें।
test/github.test.js
Outdated
| // OCK PR search test | ||
| describe.skip('#OCK.github.searchPullRequests(query, options);', async function() { | ||
| it('should start the task of archiving contributors for REPO_OWNER', async function() { | ||
| this.timeout(100000); | ||
| let prSearchResults = await githubApi.searchPullRequests(pullRequestsFixture.PR_SEARCH_QUERY); | ||
| assert.isNotNull(prSearchResults, "No PR search results returned"); | ||
| expect(prSearchResults).to.be.an('object'); | ||
| expect(prSearchResults).to.have.all.keys('items', 'total_count', 'incomplete_results'); | ||
| expect(prSearchResults.items).to.be.an('array'); | ||
| expect(prSearchResults.items).to.have.lengthOf.at.least(1); | ||
| expect(prSearchResults.items[0]).to.include.all.keys('title', 'html_url', 'state', 'user', 'draft', 'repository_url', 'comments', 'comments_url', 'assignees', 'created_at', 'closed_at'); | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate describe block for searchPullRequests with and without .skip. This seems like an error. Confirm if both are necessary or if one should be removed.
Also applies to: 58-59
test/github.test.js
Outdated
| assert.isNotNull(contributors); | ||
| expect(contributors).to.be.an('array', 'Not an array') | ||
| expect(contributors.length).to.be.greaterThanOrEqual(contributorsFixture.ALL_REPO_CONTRIBUTOR_COUNT_MIN); | ||
| expect(contributors[0]).to.include.all.keys('login','id','node_id','avatar_url','gravatar_id','url','html_url','followers_url','following_url','gists_url','starred_url','subscriptions_url','organizations_url','repos_url','events_url','received_events_url','type','site_admin','contributions'); | ||
| }) | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| // OCK PR search test | ||
| describe.skip('#OCK.github.searchPullRequests(query, options);', async function() { | ||
| it('should start the task of archiving contributors for REPO_OWNER', async function() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test case descriptions mention "archiving contributors," which does not align with the pull request search functionality being tested. Update the descriptions to accurately reflect the tests.
Also applies to: 60-60
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai can you create an issue for this task
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 NOTE
Deep insights is a beta feature.
@gitcommitshow An issue has been created to address the task of updating test case descriptions in test/github.test.js. You can view and track the progress of this issue at the following link: Update Test Descriptions for PR Search Functionality.
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create an issue for updating test case descriptions in test/github.test.js
gh issue create --title "Update Test Descriptions for PR Search Functionality" --body "The test case descriptions in `test/github.test.js` currently mention 'archiving contributors,' which is not accurate for the pull request search functionality tests. These descriptions need to be updated to reflect the actual tests being performed."
Length of output: 496
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
github.js
Outdated
| /** | ||
| * Get all search results, not just one page | ||
| * @param {string} query | ||
| * @param {Object} options | ||
| * @param {Object} options.maxResults limit maximum results | ||
| */ | ||
| export async function recursiveSearchPullRequests(query, options){ | ||
| let prList = []; | ||
| let pageNo = 1; | ||
| let maxResults = options.maxResults || 10000; | ||
| let searchResultObject = await searchPullRequests(query, Object.assign({ pageNo: pageNo }, options)); | ||
| // Iterate over results if there are more results expected by the user | ||
| if(!searchResultObject || !searchResultObject.items || !searchResultObject.items.length<1 || maxResults < 100){ | ||
| return prList; | ||
| } | ||
| prList.push(searchResultObject.items); | ||
| let incomplete_results = searchResultObject.incomplete_results; | ||
| while(prList.length < searchResultObject.total_count && !incomplete_results){ | ||
| pageNo++; | ||
| try { | ||
| let nextPageSearchResultObject = await searchPullRequests(query, { pageNo: pageNo } ); | ||
| prList.push(...nextPageSearchResultObject.items); | ||
| incomplete_results = nextPageSearchResultObject.incomplete_results; | ||
| } catch (err) { | ||
| console.log("Some issue in recursive search for pull requests") | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| console.log("Found "+prList.length +" PRs"+" for "+query); | ||
| return prList; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the recursiveSearchPullRequests function, the condition !searchResultObject.items.length<1 seems to be incorrect due to operator precedence. It should be !(searchResultObject.items.length < 1) or searchResultObject.items.length >= 1.
- if(!searchResultObject || !searchResultObject.items || !searchResultObject.items.length<1 || maxResults < 100){
+ if(!searchResultObject || !searchResultObject.items || !(searchResultObject.items.length >= 1) || maxResults < 100){Additionally, the function does not handle the case where maxResults is less than the total number of pull requests available. It should stop fetching more pages when the maxResults limit is reached.
Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| /** | |
| * Get all search results, not just one page | |
| * @param {string} query | |
| * @param {Object} options | |
| * @param {Object} options.maxResults limit maximum results | |
| */ | |
| export async function recursiveSearchPullRequests(query, options){ | |
| let prList = []; | |
| let pageNo = 1; | |
| let maxResults = options.maxResults || 10000; | |
| let searchResultObject = await searchPullRequests(query, Object.assign({ pageNo: pageNo }, options)); | |
| // Iterate over results if there are more results expected by the user | |
| if(!searchResultObject || !searchResultObject.items || !searchResultObject.items.length<1 || maxResults < 100){ | |
| return prList; | |
| } | |
| prList.push(searchResultObject.items); | |
| let incomplete_results = searchResultObject.incomplete_results; | |
| while(prList.length < searchResultObject.total_count && !incomplete_results){ | |
| pageNo++; | |
| try { | |
| let nextPageSearchResultObject = await searchPullRequests(query, { pageNo: pageNo } ); | |
| prList.push(...nextPageSearchResultObject.items); | |
| incomplete_results = nextPageSearchResultObject.incomplete_results; | |
| } catch (err) { | |
| console.log("Some issue in recursive search for pull requests") | |
| } | |
| } | |
| console.log("Found "+prList.length +" PRs"+" for "+query); | |
| return prList; | |
| /** | |
| * Get all search results, not just one page | |
| * @param {string} query | |
| * @param {Object} options | |
| * @param {Object} options.maxResults limit maximum results | |
| */ | |
| export async function recursiveSearchPullRequests(query, options){ | |
| let prList = []; | |
| let pageNo = 1; | |
| let maxResults = options.maxResults || 10000; | |
| let searchResultObject = await searchPullRequests(query, Object.assign({ pageNo: pageNo }, options)); | |
| // Iterate over results if there are more results expected by the user | |
| if(!searchResultObject || !searchResultObject.items || !(searchResultObject.items.length >= 1) || maxResults < 100){ | |
| return prList; | |
| } | |
| prList.push(searchResultObject.items); | |
| let incomplete_results = searchResultObject.incomplete_results; | |
| while(prList.length < searchResultObject.total_count && !incomplete_results && prList.length < maxResults){ | |
| pageNo++; | |
| try { | |
| let nextPageSearchResultObject = await searchPullRequests(query, { pageNo: pageNo } ); | |
| prList.push(...nextPageSearchResultObject.items); | |
| incomplete_results = nextPageSearchResultObject.incomplete_results; | |
| } catch (err) { | |
| console.log("Some issue in recursive search for pull requests") | |
| } | |
| } | |
| console.log("Found "+prList.length +" PRs"+" for "+query); | |
| return prList; | |
| } |
| import * as contributorsLib from './github.js'; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Bundling all APIs together |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 NOTE
Codebase verification is a beta feature.
The github.js file is present in the codebase, as confirmed by the output of the fd command. However, both the ast-grep and rg commands did not find the archiveContributorsLeaderboard function within this file. This suggests that the function is not exported from github.js, which could potentially lead to issues where it is expected to be used.
Final response to the review comment:
The archiveContribitorsLeaderboard function does not appear to be present or exported from github.js. This could lead to issues in index.js where the function is expected to be available. It is recommended to verify the presence and correct export of this function within github.js to ensure the proper functionality of the APIs that depend on it.
- The
archiveContribitorsLeaderboardfunction is not found ingithub.js.
Analysis chain
Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-14]
Verify that the archiveContributorsLeaderboard function is still available and correctly exported from github.js after the file renaming, as it is being used here.
Given the warning from ast-grep and the possibility that the function could be exported in a different manner than the pattern I used, I will write a new script using ripgrep (rg) to search for the string archiveContributorsLeaderboard within github.js to verify if it is present and exported.
Before concluding, I will verify the presence of the github.js file to ensure that the file exists and is located where expected. This will help to confirm that the absence of the function archiveContribitorsLeaderboard is not due to the file not being found.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the export of `archiveContributorsLeaderboard` in `github.js`.
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'export function archiveContributorsLeaderboard($_, $_)'
Length of output: 440
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the string 'archiveContributorsLeaderboard' in 'github.js' to verify if it is present and exported.
rg 'archiveContribitorsLeaderboard' --files-with-matches
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the presence of the `github.js` file in the codebase.
fd 'github.js'
Length of output: 24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 9
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- archive.js (1 hunks)
- github.js (4 hunks)
- network.js (1 hunks)
- test/archive.test.js (1 hunks)
- test/github.test.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/github.test.js
Additional comments: 12
archive.js (1)
- 27-33: Verify if the 'a+' flag for
fs.writeFileis the intended behavior, as it will append to the file if it exists, which might not be desired for an archive operation.github.js (7)
7-7: Import statement for
archive.jsadded to support new functionality.28-45: New function
getRepoDetailadded for fetching repository details from GitHub.227-246: New function
searchPullRequestsadded for searching pull requests on GitHub.248-275: New function
recursivelySearchPullRequestsadded for retrieving all search results for pull requests, handling pagination.278-300: New function
aggregateAllPullRequestsadded for aggregating all pull requests based on a specified field.302-321: New function
archiveReposWithMatchingPullRequestsadded for archiving repos that have matching pull requests.197-202: Refactored
writeContributorLeaderboardToFileto use thearchivemodule for file operations.test/archive.test.js (4)
10-10: The
describe.skipis used to skip the entire suite of tests for#archive(jsonArray);. Please confirm that this is intentional and provide a reason for skipping these tests, as it is not mentioned in the PR overview.13-16: The test case for archiving is using
pullRequestsFixture.VALID_PR_SEARCH_RESULT_ITEMSwhich seems to be related to the new pull request functionality. Please verify if this is the correct fixture to use for testing the archiving functionality.2-2: The import of
archive.jsis correct and aligns with the changes made in the codebase.4-4: The import of
pullRequests.fixture.jsis appropriate for the new test cases related to pull request functionality.
| export function writeToFile(content, options){ | ||
| const ARCHIVE_FOLDER = options.archiveFolder || process.cwd(); | ||
| const ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH = path.join(ARCHIVE_FOLDER, options.archiveFileName || `archive-${getFormattedDate()}.csv`); | ||
| fs.writeFile(ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH, content, { flag: 'a+' }, err => { | ||
| if (err) { | ||
| console.error(err); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| console.log("The file was saved!"); | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The writeToFile function logs errors to the console but does not propagate them. Consider throwing an error or returning a rejected promise to allow the caller to handle it.
- console.error(err);
- return;
+ throw err;Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| export function writeToFile(content, options){ | |
| const ARCHIVE_FOLDER = options.archiveFolder || process.cwd(); | |
| const ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH = path.join(ARCHIVE_FOLDER, options.archiveFileName || `archive-${getFormattedDate()}.csv`); | |
| fs.writeFile(ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH, content, { flag: 'a+' }, err => { | |
| if (err) { | |
| console.error(err); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| console.log("The file was saved!"); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| export function writeToFile(content, options){ | |
| const ARCHIVE_FOLDER = options.archiveFolder || process.cwd(); | |
| const ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH = path.join(ARCHIVE_FOLDER, options.archiveFileName || `archive-${getFormattedDate()}.csv`); | |
| fs.writeFile(ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH, content, { flag: 'a+' }, err => { | |
| if (err) { | |
| throw err; | |
| } | |
| console.log("The file was saved!"); | |
| }); | |
| } |
| if (!data || !Array.isArray(data) || data.length<1) { | ||
| console.log("No content to write."); | ||
| return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The check for data before writing to CSV is good, but consider throwing an error instead of just logging to the console for better error handling.
- console.log("No content to write.");
- return;
+ throw new Error("No content to write.");Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (!data || !Array.isArray(data) || data.length<1) { | |
| console.log("No content to write."); | |
| return; | |
| if (!data || !Array.isArray(data) || data.length<1) { | |
| throw new Error("No content to write."); |
| import * as path from 'path'; | ||
| import * as fs from 'fs'; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Writes json data to a csv file | ||
| * @param {Array<Object>} data - The data to be written to the file. | ||
| * @param {string} [options.archiveFolder=process.cwd()] - The folder where the file will be saved. Defaults to the current working directory. | ||
| * @param {string} [options.archiveFileName='archive-YYYYMMDDHHmmss.csv'] - The name of the file to be written. Defaults to 'archive-YYYYMMDDHHmmss.csv'. | ||
| */ | ||
| export function save(data, options = {}) { | ||
| if (!data || !Array.isArray(data) || data.length<1) { | ||
| console.log("No content to write."); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| // Prepare content for csv | ||
| let allKeys = Array.from(new Set(data.flatMap(Object.keys))); | ||
| const headers = allKeys.join(','); | ||
| const rows = data.map(obj => formatCSVRow(obj, allKeys)).join("\n"); | ||
| const csvContent = headers + "\n" + rows; | ||
| writeToFile(csvContent, options); | ||
| return csvContent; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export function writeToFile(content, options){ | ||
| const ARCHIVE_FOLDER = options.archiveFolder || process.cwd(); | ||
| const ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH = path.join(ARCHIVE_FOLDER, options.archiveFileName || `archive-${getFormattedDate()}.csv`); | ||
| fs.writeFile(ARCHIVE_FULL_PATH, content, { flag: 'a+' }, err => { | ||
| if (err) { | ||
| console.error(err); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| console.log("The file was saved!"); | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function formatCSVRow(obj, keys) { | ||
| return keys.map(key => formatCSVCell(obj[key])).join(','); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| function formatCSVCell(value) { | ||
| if (value === undefined || value === null) { | ||
| return ''; | ||
| } else if (typeof value === 'object') { | ||
| // Stringify objects/arrays and escape double quotes | ||
| return `"${JSON.stringify(value).replace(/"/g, '""')}"`; | ||
| } else if (typeof value === 'string') { | ||
| // Check for commas or line breaks and escape double quotes | ||
| if (value.includes(',') || value.includes('\n')) { | ||
| return `"${value.replace(/"/g, '""')}"`; | ||
| } else { | ||
| return value; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| return value.toString(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export function getFormattedDate() { | ||
| const now = new Date(); | ||
| return now.toISOString().replace(/[\-\:T\.Z]/g, ''); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace console.log and console.error with a more robust logging mechanism that allows for different logging levels and potentially different outputs, which is more suitable for production environments.
| Object.assign(repo, repoDetail); | ||
| } | ||
| archive.save(repos, { archiveFileName: `repos-pr-${query}-${options.maxResults || 1000}-${archive.getFormattedDate()}.csv` }); | ||
| return repos; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing newline at the end of the file.
+ \nCommittable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| } | |
| } | |
network.js
Outdated
| // Wait for 500ms | ||
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
कोड कमेंट में देरी को 500ms के रूप में बताया गया है, जबकि वास्तविक देरी 2000ms है। कृपया कमेंट को सही करें ताकि यह वास्तविक कोड के अनुरूप हो।
- // Wait for 500ms
+ // Wait for 2000msCommittable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // Wait for 500ms | |
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); | |
| // Wait for 2000ms | |
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); |
| @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ export async function makeRequestWithRateLimit(method, url, options){ | |||
| if (!flow || flow.shouldRun()) { | |||
| // Add business logic to process incoming request | |||
| console.log("Request accepted. Processing..."); | |||
| // Wait for 500ms | |||
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); | |||
| const {res, data} = await makeRequest(...arguments) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
...arguments का उपयोग करने के बजाय, यह अधिक स्पष्ट होगा यदि हम method, url, और options को सीधे makeRequest फंक्शन में पास करें। इससे कोड की पठनीयता और रखरखाव में सुधार होगा।
- const {res, data} = await makeRequest(...arguments)
+ const {res, data} = await makeRequest(method, url, options)Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const {res, data} = await makeRequest(...arguments) | |
| const {res, data} = await makeRequest(method, url, options) |
network.js
Outdated
| if (!flow || flow.shouldRun()) { | ||
| // Add business logic to process incoming request | ||
| console.log("Request accepted. Processing..."); | ||
| // Wait for 500ms | ||
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); | ||
| const {res, data} = await makeRequest(...arguments) | ||
| return { res, data} | ||
| } else { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
जब Aperture client setup विफल हो जाता है, तो फंक्शन केवल एरर लॉग करता है और प्रॉमिस को रिजेक्ट नहीं करता है। इससे कॉलिंग फंक्शन को विफलता का पता नहीं चल पाता है। कृपया एरर हैंडलिंग जोड़ें जो प्रॉमिस को रिजेक्ट करे या एरर फेंके।
} catch(err){
console.error("Aperture client for rate limiting is not setup correctly");
console.log("Make sure to setup set correct APERTURE_SERVICE_ADDRESS and APERTURE_API_KEY in environment variables");
console.log("Going to make request without rate limit");
+ reject(new Error("Aperture client setup failed"));
} finally {Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (!flow || flow.shouldRun()) { | |
| // Add business logic to process incoming request | |
| console.log("Request accepted. Processing..."); | |
| // Wait for 500ms | |
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); | |
| const {res, data} = await makeRequest(...arguments) | |
| return { res, data} | |
| } else { | |
| if (!flow || flow.shouldRun()) { | |
| // Add business logic to process incoming request | |
| console.log("Request accepted. Processing..."); | |
| // Wait for 500ms | |
| await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000)); | |
| const {res, data} = await makeRequest(...arguments) | |
| return { res, data} | |
| } else { | |
| } catch(err){ | |
| console.error("Aperture client for rate limiting is not setup correctly"); | |
| console.log("Make sure to setup set correct APERTURE_SERVICE_ADDRESS and APERTURE_API_KEY in environment variables"); | |
| console.log("Going to make request without rate limit"); | |
| reject(new Error("Aperture client setup failed")); | |
| } finally { |
finally ब्लॉक हमेशा एक्जीक्यूट होता है, यहां तक कि अगर catch ब्लॉक पहले ही प्रॉमिस को रिजेक्ट कर चुका है। इससे अप्रत्याशित व्यवहार हो सकता है। finally ब्लॉक को तब तक रिक्वेस्ट नहीं बनानी चाहिए जब तक प्रॉमिस रिजेक्ट नहीं हो जाती।
अगर flow ऑब्जेक्ट एरर के कारण नहीं बनता है, तो flow.setStatus या flow.end को कॉल करने पर रेफरेंस एरर हो सकता है। flow के मेथड्स को कॉल करने से पहले यह सुनिश्चित करें कि flow परिभाषित है।
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- github.js (4 hunks)
- test/lifecycle.test.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 8
github.js (7)
7-7:
archivemodule ka import statement add kiya gaya hai, jo kifsmodule ke direct use ko replace karta hai file writing ke liye. Ye change code ko modular banata hai aurarchivemodule ke reuse ko badhava deta hai.35-45:
getRepoDetailfunction mein input validation aur error handling dono sahi tarike se kiye gaye hain. Ye function GitHub API se repository details fetch karta hai aur JSON parse karke return karta hai.197-202:
writeContributorLeaderboardToFilefunction ko refactor kiya gaya hai takiarchive.writeToFilemethod ka use ho. Ye change code ko aur clean aur maintainable banata hai.233-245:
searchPullRequestsfunction GitHub API se pull requests search karta hai. Error handling nahi dikh raha hai, lekin maan liya ja sakta hai kimakeRequestWithRateLimitfunction errors ko handle karta hai.254-274:
recursivelySearchPullRequestsfunction mein loop logic aur error handling dono sahi tarike se implement kiye gaye hain. Ye function multiple pages se pull requests ko recursively fetch karta hai.284-299:
aggregateAllPullRequestsfunction pull requests ko ek specified field ke basis par aggregate karta hai. Reduce logic sahi implement kiya gaya hai.307-320:
archiveReposWithMatchingPullRequestsfunction mein error handling aur data processing dono sahi tarike se kiye gaye hain. Ye function matching pull requests ke saath repositories ko archive karta hai.test/lifecycle.test.js (1)
- 5-12:
lifecycletest suite meinaperture configske liye tests add kiye gaye hain jo ki naye environment variablesAPERTURE_SERVICE_ADDRESSaurAPERTURE_API_KEYke existence ko verify karte hain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- ENV_SAMPLE (1 hunks)
- network.js (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
ENV_SAMPLE (1)
- 2-5: नए environment variables
APERTURE_SERVICE_ADDRESS,APERTURE_API_KEY, औरMAX_RATE_LIMIT_WAIT_DURATION_MSकोENV_SAMPLEमें जोड़ा गया है। इनका उपयोग करते समय सुनिश्चित करें कि इन्हें सही ढंग से configure किया गया है और ये सभी required services के साथ compatible हैं।network.js (6)
2-4:
FlowStatusको@fluxninja/aperture-jsसे import किया गया है औरMAX_RATE_LIMIT_WAIT_DURATION_MSconstant को जोड़ा गया है। यह सुनिश्चित करें कि@fluxninja/aperture-jspackage को project dependencies में शामिल किया गया है औरMAX_RATE_LIMIT_WAIT_DURATION_MSका मान environment variable से सही ढंग से पढ़ा जा रहा है।51-53:
res.on('end'...)callback को arrow function से regular function में बदला गया है। यह ध्यान दें कि इससेthisका context बदल सकता है। यदिthisका उपयोग callback में किया जा रहा है, तो इसे ध्यान से handle करना होगा।98-98:
makeRequestWithRateLimitfunction मेंmethodparameter के लिए default value "GET" जोड़ी गई है। यह सुनिश्चित करें कि इस default value का उपयोग करने वाले सभी calls में यह उम्मीद की गई है।105-105:
tokensकी value को HTTP method के आधार पर बदला गया है। यह सुनिश्चित करें कि यह बदलाव rate limiting logic के अनुरूप है और सभी relevant methods के लिए उचित है।109-109:
deadlineकी value मेंMAX_RATE_LIMIT_WAIT_DURATION_MSconstant का उपयोग किया गया है। यह सुनिश्चित करें कि यह मान सभी scenarios में उचित है और rate limiting के लिए कोई अनपेक्षित व्यवहार नहीं करता है।123-123:
makeRequestWithRateLimitfunction में actual request बनाने से पहले 500ms की delay जोड़ी गई है। यह सुनिश्चित करें कि यह delay आवश्यक है और इससे performance पर नकारात्मक प्रभाव नहीं पड़ता है।
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Tests
Documentation