Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add more tests #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add more tests #1

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cyyeh
Copy link
Owner

@cyyeh cyyeh commented Dec 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new test cases for bipartite graph functionality, enhancing coverage for various edge cases.
      • Tests include scenarios for disconnected components, single vertex, complex structures, odd cycles, and non-bipartite graphs.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces comprehensive test cases for the bipartite graph implementation in the test suite. These new test methods cover various scenarios including disconnected graph components, single vertex graphs, complex graph structures, odd-length cycles, and edge case behaviors. The tests aim to validate the robustness of the bipartite graph functionality by examining different graph configurations and ensuring correct identification of bipartite and non-bipartite graphs.

Changes

File Change Summary
data-structures/graph/test_bipartite_graph.py Added 6 new test methods to TestBipartiteGraph class:
- test_disconnected_components: Checks bipartiteness of disconnected graph components
- test_single_vertex: Verifies single vertex graph is bipartite
- test_complex_bipartite: Tests complex bipartite graph structure
- test_odd_cycle_not_bipartite: Confirms odd-length cycle is not bipartite
- test_partite_sets_none_for_non_bipartite: Checks non-bipartite graph behavior
- test_add_same_edge_twice: Ensures repeated edge addition doesn't affect bipartiteness

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Graph Testing 🧩

In vertices and edges, we explore,
Bipartite secrets, we now implore,
Disconnected, cyclic, complex and neat,
Our tests make graph logic complete!
Hop, hop, testing with rabbit delight! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8c6055 and b4b25bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • data-structures/graph/test_bipartite_graph.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
data-structures/graph/test_bipartite_graph.py (6)

43-52: Good coverage of disconnected bipartite scenarios.
This test accurately checks that a graph with multiple disconnected components remains bipartite overall. An additional optional check could verify each component’s partite sets if deeper validation is desired.


53-59: Effective single-vertex case handling.
Covering a single-vertex scenario ensures completeness. The assertion verifying the vertex’s presence in one of the sets is appropriate.


60-75: Thorough test of a larger bipartite configuration.
Building a more complex bipartite graph and confirming the division of vertices into separate sets provides robust coverage. You may optionally test set membership if more precise checks are needed.


76-85: Correctly identifies odd-cycle non-bipartite scenario.
Detecting odd-length cycles is core to bipartite logic, and this test solidifies coverage for that case.


86-93: Validation of partite sets in non-bipartite case.
It’s a solid design choice to return None when partite sets don’t exist. This test adds clarity to expected behavior.


94-101: Ensuring idempotency when adding the same edge multiple times.
This test confirms that duplicate edges don’t alter the bipartite nature or inflate the vertex count. Excellent edge case coverage.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant