Skip to content

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #818

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements

fix: use a more specific regex for jinja2 set/for statements #818

Triggered via pull request October 23, 2024 15:58
Status Skipped
Total duration 3s
Artifacts

builds-review.yaml

on: pull_request
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in