Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency dotenv to v9 #58

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented May 9, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
dotenv ^8.2.0 -> 9.0.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

motdotla/dotenv

v9.0.2

Compare Source

Changed
  • Support windows newlines with debug mode

v9.0.1

Compare Source

Changed
  • Updates to README

v9.0.0

Compare Source

Added
  • define package.json in exports
  • allow for import "dotenv/config"
Changed
  • updated dev dependencies via npm audit
  • TypeScript types
  • point to exact types file to work with VS Code
  • Breaking: drop support for Node v8

Configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/dotenv-9.x branch from feb5442 to 9689fef Compare May 15, 2021 19:11
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants