Humanized process status view

[edan-bainglass]

This PR implements a simpler process status tree.

The tree is

• human readable
• collapsible
• linked with advanced node viewer
• resettable (collapse all)
• lazy loaded
• animated (smooth collapse/expand - may require JS to compute heights - low priority)

TODO

• Allow for dynamic growing total jobs count for restart workflows
• Add tests

---

---

Current implementation also marks restart workflows with a *, including a description.

Future PRs will consider dynamic totals.

Component of #1042

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.44981% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.04%. Comparing base (416fb6f) to head (57bac8c).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...c/aiidalab_qe/app/result/components/status/tree.py	93.01%	16 Missing ⚠️
...aiidalab_qe/app/result/components/status/status.py	88.88%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/aiidalab_qe/common/widgets.py	25.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1048      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.99%   69.04%   +1.05%     
==========================================
  Files         113      114       +1     
  Lines        6734     6995     +261     
==========================================
+ Hits         4579     4830     +251     
- Misses       2155     2165      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.11	69.04% <91.44%> (+1.05%)	⬆️
python-3.9	69.05% <91.07%> (+1.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[AndresOrtegaGuerrero]

Some issues you might find related , or that your PR will be addressing
#113
#87

[edan-bainglass]

Some issues you might find related , or that your PR will be addressing #113 #87

Thanks @AndresOrtegaGuerrero. Indeed related. Especially #87, the ideas of which I already had in mind. Though I was wondering if it should be generalized on the AiiDA level.

class MyWorkChain(WorkChain):
    _humanized_description = "Compute something"

    def get_human_readable_description(self):
        return self._humanized_description

Side question, we are currently on issue 1000+. Do you just happen to remember these ancient issues, or did you go looking? 😅 Asking for my own edification, so I can better find related issues.

[AndresOrtegaGuerrero]

This was an old discussion , so i new Marnik mentioned this in the past, , but indeed there a need of cleaning old issues.

[edan-bainglass]

This was an old discussion , so i new Marnik mentioned this in the past, , but indeed there a need of cleaning old issues.

No doubt! After the release, I plan to go through all issues, close what has not been automatically closed, and prep the agenda for the next release from all that are open.

[AndresOrtegaGuerrero]

Is this behaviour expected ,

Screen.Recording.2025-01-08.at.12.01.42.mov

If i go to Generate k-points (since it has a link) it sends me to the Advanced status view .. isnt a lil confusing ? or that is what is required ?

[AndresOrtegaGuerrero]

I would suggest that in the "Humanized view: there is a link to the parameters from QuantumEspresso that arent visible in the summary , and that some users might want to easily see ,

[edan-bainglass]

Is this behaviour expected ,

Screen.Recording.2025-01-08.at.12.01.42.mov
If i go to Generate k-points (since it has a link) it sends me to the Advanced status view .. isnt a lil confusing ? or that is what is required ?

Intended behavior, but we since discussed changes that address all your comments. Will document here soon. Note that the idea is to implement a couple prior to the release, with the rest (requiring more work) punted down for now.