Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Hashing for Databricks when other Datatype is selected #296

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

tkirschke
Copy link
Member

@tkirschke tkirschke commented Jan 7, 2025

Description

If Hashdatatype for Databricks was set to something else than STRING, the IFNULL failed. An additional CAST is added.

Fixes #295

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

add hashing datatype fix for sha1 on databricks also for multi-active hash standardization
@tkirschke tkirschke added the testing To trigger the automated test workflow as internal User. label Jan 7, 2025
@remoteworkflow
Copy link

remoteworkflow bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Link to workflow summary: https://github.com/ScalefreeCOM/datavault4dbt-ci-cd/actions/runs/12650008605


RESULTS for Synapse:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Postgres:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for BigQuery:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Redshift:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Snowflake:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Exasol:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Fabric:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Oracle:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests


RESULTS for Databricks:
❌ dbt-tests
❌ dbt-macro-tests

@remoteworkflow remoteworkflow bot removed the testing To trigger the automated test workflow as internal User. label Jan 7, 2025
@tkiehn
Copy link
Collaborator

tkiehn commented Jan 8, 2025

Merged into test-branch (78af272)

@tkiehn tkiehn marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2025 11:58
@tkiehn
Copy link
Collaborator

tkiehn commented Jan 9, 2025

Closed in favor of #300

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants