Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Components] mailgenius #14754 #15056

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Components] mailgenius #14754 #15056

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

lcaresia
Copy link
Collaborator

@lcaresia lcaresia commented Dec 20, 2024

Resolves #14754

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced actions to retrieve daily email test limits, email audit information, and email test results.
    • Added a property for selecting email slugs in the MailGenius application.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for exceeding daily limits on email audits.
  • Chores

    • Updated version number of the MailGenius component and added new dependencies.

@lcaresia lcaresia self-assigned this Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 20, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 20, 2024 9:11pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 20, 2024 9:11pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 20, 2024 9:11pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5907da2 and c98d30f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-result/get-email-result.mjs (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the MailGenius component in the Pipedream platform. The changes include the addition of new actions for retrieving daily email test limits, generating email audits, and fetching email test results. The main application file (mailgenius.app.mjs) has been enhanced with new methods to interact with the MailGenius API, including request handling, email slug retrieval, and specific API endpoint interactions. The package version has been updated, and a new platform dependency has been added.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/mailgenius/actions/get-daily-limit/get-daily-limit.mjs New action to retrieve daily email test limits
components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-audit/get-email-audit.mjs New action to generate email audit test
components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-result/get-email-result.mjs New action to fetch email test results
components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs Added new methods for API interaction, including _baseUrl, _makeRequest, emailAudit, emailResult, getDailyLimit, and getEmails
components/mailgenius/package.json Version updated to 0.1.0, added @pipedream/platform dependency

Suggested Labels

action

Suggested Reviewers

  • jcortes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of MailGenius might,
New actions dancing in digital light!
API calls spinning with grace,
Emails tested at lightning pace,
Code hopping forward, pure delight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs (1)

24-26: Hardcoded base URL.
Using a dedicated method to return the base URL is good for clarity and maintainability. If MailGenius provides a sandbox or multiple environments, consider a configurable approach to switch environments.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a437fcb and 5907da2.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • components/mailgenius/actions/get-daily-limit/get-daily-limit.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-audit/get-email-audit.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-result/get-email-result.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/mailgenius/package.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs (7)

1-1: Import from @pipedream/platform looks good.
No issues found.


6-22: Slug propDefinition is clearly structured.
This propDefinition properly implements an async options method to dynamically retrieve and map “slug” options from getEmails(). The code is concise and maintainable.


27-43: Generic _makeRequest function is well-structured.
The code cleanly centralizes request logic with user authentication. Confirm that the “Authorization” header is accepted by the MailGenius API in place of any additional parameters (e.g. x-api-key).


44-49: emailAudit method.
Function correctly wraps _makeRequest with the “/external/api/email-audit” endpoint.


50-57: emailResult method uses slug.
Implementation properly passes the slug to retrieve results for specific email audits. No issues.


58-63: getDailyLimit method.
Good architectural choice to separate this logic from other calls. No issues found.


64-69: getEmails method fetches available audits.
Method design is consistent with the rest of the file. The spread operator effectively handles additional arguments.

components/mailgenius/package.json (2)

3-3: Version bump to 0.1.0
This semantic version increment suggests a feature release. Confirm that the changes introduced fully warrant moving from 0.0.x to 0.1.x.


14-16: Added @pipedream/platform as a dependency
This aligns with the usage of axios from "@pipedream/platform". Looks good.

components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-audit/get-email-audit.mjs (1)

1-22: New action: Get Email Audit
The action is straightforward, making a single call to emailAudit. The $summary is well-designed to help users see the primary output. No immediate issues.

components/mailgenius/actions/get-daily-limit/get-daily-limit.mjs (1)

1-22: New action: Get Daily Limit
Logic references getDailyLimit from the app and sets a clear $summary. No issues found.

components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-result/get-email-result.mjs (2)

1-8: LGTM! Verify the API documentation link.

The module structure and metadata are well-defined. The inclusion of API documentation link is appreciated.

Let's verify if the API documentation link is accessible:

✅ Verification successful

API documentation link is accessible and valid

The API documentation link (https://app.mailgenius.com/api-docs/index.html) returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming it's accessible and valid.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the API documentation link is accessible
curl -I https://app.mailgenius.com/api-docs/index.html

Length of output: 1513


9-17: Verify the slug propDefinition in the app file.

The props structure is correct, but let's ensure the slug propDefinition is properly defined in the app file.

✅ Verification successful

The slug propDefinition is correctly defined in the app file

The verification confirms that the slug propDefinition is properly defined in mailgenius.app.mjs with appropriate type, label, description, and an async options function that fetches available email slugs from the API. The prop usage in the component is valid.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the slug propDefinition exists in the app file
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
  $$$
  slug: {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}' components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs

Length of output: 118


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the app file exists and see its content
cat components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs

Length of output: 1640

Comment on lines +19 to +28
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.emailResult({
$,
slug: this.slug,
});

$.export("$summary", `The test results are '${response.status}'`);

return response;
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and response validation.

The current implementation could be more robust with the following improvements:

  1. Add error handling for the API call
  2. Validate the response structure
  3. Add null checks for the status field in the summary message

Consider applying this improvement:

 async run({ $ }) {
-    const response = await this.app.emailResult({
-      $,
-      slug: this.slug,
-    });
+    try {
+      const response = await this.app.emailResult({
+        $,
+        slug: this.slug,
+      });
+      
+      if (!response || typeof response !== 'object') {
+        throw new Error('Invalid response from MailGenius API');
+      }
 
-    $.export("$summary", `The test results are '${response.status}'`);
+      const status = response.status ?? 'unknown';
+      $.export("$summary", `The test results are '${status}'`);
 
-    return response;
+      return response;
+    } catch (error) {
+      throw new Error(`Failed to get email results: ${error.message}`);
+    }
   },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
const response = await this.app.emailResult({
$,
slug: this.slug,
});
$.export("$summary", `The test results are '${response.status}'`);
return response;
},
async run({ $ }) {
try {
const response = await this.app.emailResult({
$,
slug: this.slug,
});
if (!response || typeof response !== 'object') {
throw new Error('Invalid response from MailGenius API');
}
const status = response.status ?? 'unknown';
$.export("$summary", `The test results are '${status}'`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Failed to get email results: ${error.message}`);
}
},

Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @lcaresia, LGTM! Ready for QA!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Components] mailgenius
2 participants