-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Components] mailgenius #14754 #15056
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive update to the MailGenius component in the Pipedream platform. The changes include the addition of new actions for retrieving daily email test limits, generating email audits, and fetching email test results. The main application file ( Changes
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs (1)
24-26
: Hardcoded base URL.
Using a dedicated method to return the base URL is good for clarity and maintainability. If MailGenius provides a sandbox or multiple environments, consider a configurable approach to switch environments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/mailgenius/actions/get-daily-limit/get-daily-limit.mjs
(1 hunks)components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-audit/get-email-audit.mjs
(1 hunks)components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-result/get-email-result.mjs
(1 hunks)components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs
(1 hunks)components/mailgenius/package.json
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs (7)
1-1
: Import from @pipedream/platform looks good.
No issues found.
6-22
: Slug propDefinition is clearly structured.
This propDefinition properly implements an async options method to dynamically retrieve and map “slug” options from getEmails(). The code is concise and maintainable.
27-43
: Generic _makeRequest function is well-structured.
The code cleanly centralizes request logic with user authentication. Confirm that the “Authorization” header is accepted by the MailGenius API in place of any additional parameters (e.g. x-api-key).
44-49
: emailAudit method.
Function correctly wraps _makeRequest with the “/external/api/email-audit” endpoint.
50-57
: emailResult method uses slug.
Implementation properly passes the slug to retrieve results for specific email audits. No issues.
58-63
: getDailyLimit method.
Good architectural choice to separate this logic from other calls. No issues found.
64-69
: getEmails method fetches available audits.
Method design is consistent with the rest of the file. The spread operator effectively handles additional arguments.
components/mailgenius/package.json (2)
3-3
: Version bump to 0.1.0
This semantic version increment suggests a feature release. Confirm that the changes introduced fully warrant moving from 0.0.x to 0.1.x.
14-16
: Added @pipedream/platform as a dependency
This aligns with the usage of axios from "@pipedream/platform". Looks good.
components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-audit/get-email-audit.mjs (1)
1-22
: New action: Get Email Audit
The action is straightforward, making a single call to emailAudit
. The $summary
is well-designed to help users see the primary output. No immediate issues.
components/mailgenius/actions/get-daily-limit/get-daily-limit.mjs (1)
1-22
: New action: Get Daily Limit
Logic references getDailyLimit
from the app and sets a clear $summary
. No issues found.
components/mailgenius/actions/get-email-result/get-email-result.mjs (2)
1-8
: LGTM! Verify the API documentation link.
The module structure and metadata are well-defined. The inclusion of API documentation link is appreciated.
Let's verify if the API documentation link is accessible:
✅ Verification successful
API documentation link is accessible and valid
The API documentation link (https://app.mailgenius.com/api-docs/index.html) returns a 200 HTTP status code, confirming it's accessible and valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the API documentation link is accessible
curl -I https://app.mailgenius.com/api-docs/index.html
Length of output: 1513
9-17
: Verify the slug propDefinition in the app file.
The props structure is correct, but let's ensure the slug propDefinition is properly defined in the app file.
✅ Verification successful
The slug
propDefinition is correctly defined in the app file
The verification confirms that the slug
propDefinition is properly defined in mailgenius.app.mjs
with appropriate type, label, description, and an async options function that fetches available email slugs from the API. The prop usage in the component is valid.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the slug propDefinition exists in the app file
ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions: {
$$$
slug: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the app file exists and see its content
cat components/mailgenius/mailgenius.app.mjs
Length of output: 1640
async run({ $ }) { | ||
const response = await this.app.emailResult({ | ||
$, | ||
slug: this.slug, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
$.export("$summary", `The test results are '${response.status}'`); | ||
|
||
return response; | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and response validation.
The current implementation could be more robust with the following improvements:
- Add error handling for the API call
- Validate the response structure
- Add null checks for the status field in the summary message
Consider applying this improvement:
async run({ $ }) {
- const response = await this.app.emailResult({
- $,
- slug: this.slug,
- });
+ try {
+ const response = await this.app.emailResult({
+ $,
+ slug: this.slug,
+ });
+
+ if (!response || typeof response !== 'object') {
+ throw new Error('Invalid response from MailGenius API');
+ }
- $.export("$summary", `The test results are '${response.status}'`);
+ const status = response.status ?? 'unknown';
+ $.export("$summary", `The test results are '${status}'`);
- return response;
+ return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to get email results: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
async run({ $ }) { | |
const response = await this.app.emailResult({ | |
$, | |
slug: this.slug, | |
}); | |
$.export("$summary", `The test results are '${response.status}'`); | |
return response; | |
}, | |
async run({ $ }) { | |
try { | |
const response = await this.app.emailResult({ | |
$, | |
slug: this.slug, | |
}); | |
if (!response || typeof response !== 'object') { | |
throw new Error('Invalid response from MailGenius API'); | |
} | |
const status = response.status ?? 'unknown'; | |
$.export("$summary", `The test results are '${status}'`); | |
return response; | |
} catch (error) { | |
throw new Error(`Failed to get email results: ${error.message}`); | |
} | |
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @lcaresia, LGTM! Ready for QA!
Resolves #14754
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores