Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New theories for mt variation 40_009_xxx #2213

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jacoterh
Copy link
Collaborator

@jacoterh jacoterh commented Nov 14, 2024

This PR is for new theories where we vary the top mass for a simultaneous alphas and mt determination. Not much has been added yet, but I just wanted to claim theoryid 40_009_xxx if still available.

@jacoterh jacoterh requested a review from RoyStegeman November 14, 2024 22:09
@RoyStegeman
Copy link
Member

Thanks for opening the PR.

Our theories will be variations of 40_000_000: one exact copy (the theorycard will be the same but in the theory we will have fully NNLO FKtables for the top production dataset) and then variants where we change mt. You can just copy that theorycard to have one that is up-to-date.

@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

@RoyStegeman @jacoterh If you are doing NNLO these should be variations of 41_000_000

@RoyStegeman
Copy link
Member

It's only for the top datasets since we don't want to present the first fit with NNLO grids - or probably we can but I imagine that won't be appreciated by ppl who computed them.

@jacoterh jacoterh changed the title New theories for mt variation 40_006_xxx New theories for mt variation 40_009_xxx Dec 20, 2024
@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman force-pushed the new_mtop_theories branch 2 times, most recently from 0f1409c to b563813 Compare January 7, 2025 11:30
@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2025 14:00
@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman merged commit f9db6a7 into master Jan 8, 2025
7 checks passed
@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman deleted the new_mtop_theories branch January 8, 2025 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants