Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add
EnzymeCore
weakdep and an extension with a custom rule for the Levin transformation #97Add
EnzymeCore
weakdep and an extension with a custom rule for the Levin transformation #97Changes from 12 commits
444db1a
17b90ca
766cff5
6db401e
dbb3821
e2d1f41
fc1e4a7
71334c4
afcb934
9c6d063
6f3445c
3c30394
0e687a1
232f566
e317d3a
1578b6f
27d257f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's make sure that these two
gamma_near_1
calls are auto-vectorizing. They probably all but it might be worth a@inline
declaration on their function definition which should help the SIMD.This is a good way to do this though as using SIMD will be faster than using reflection formula!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's usually easiest to just indiscrimantely have
v = abs(v)
at the top. I'm wondering how this line affects derivative information in anyway. As the zero order derivative is obviously zero from this line. Though we don't really need this check because we are checking at the top level but I think this is fine.I think I generally like using the
modf
function and I think this would be a good fit for these type of problems.