Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JS to Ts : simulator/src/data/saveImage.ts #419

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ThatDeparted2061
Copy link

@ThatDeparted2061 ThatDeparted2061 commented Jan 22, 2025

#414
JS to TS

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Migrated saveImage functionality from JavaScript to TypeScript
    • Removed unnecessary scope parameter in the image save prompt function
  • Chores

    • Updated code to improve type safety and maintainability

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes involve migrating the saveImage.js file to a TypeScript implementation (saveImage.ts). The core functionality of creating a save image prompt remains consistent, with the primary difference being the addition of type annotations and the explicit declaration of the globalScope variable. The function continues to interact with the SimulatorStore to trigger the image save dialog.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.js Deleted JavaScript implementation of createSaveAsImgPrompt
src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.ts Added TypeScript implementation with type annotations for createSaveAsImgPrompt

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so neat,
From JS to TS, a typeful feat!
Save image prompt, now strongly typed,
With globalScope precisely shaped
A migration dance, both swift and light 🖼️

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit af34cf5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/circuitverse/deploys/6790554236d07d00080c7a0b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-419--circuitverse.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.ts (2)

4-5: Consider avoiding global variable usage

While the global variable declaration is properly typed, using global variables can make the code harder to test and maintain. Consider passing the scope as a required parameter instead.

-declare var globalScope: Scope;
-export default function createSaveAsImgPrompt(scope: Scope = globalScope): void {
+export default function createSaveAsImgPrompt(scope: Scope): void {

7-12: Update JSDoc to match TypeScript types

The JSDoc param type {Scope=} indicates an optional parameter, but the TypeScript type shows it's required with a default value. Update the JSDoc to match.

-* @param {Scope=} scope - circuit whose image we want
+* @param {Scope} scope - circuit whose image we want (defaults to globalScope)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eae6ed and af34cf5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.js (0 hunks)
  • src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.js
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/simulator/src/data/saveImage.ts (2)

1-2: Verify the type import from circuit.js

Since this is a JS to TS migration, ensure that the Scope type is properly exported from circuit.js. Consider creating type definitions or migrating the circuit file to TypeScript as well.

✅ Verification successful

Import from circuit.ts is correctly typed and exported

The import of Scope from '../circuit' is valid as circuit.ts properly exports the Scope class as its default export with TypeScript types. No changes needed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if circuit.js exists and exports Scope
rg -t js "export.*(?:class|interface|type).*Scope" "src/simulator/src"

Length of output: 70


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find circuit file in both JS and TS
echo "=== Finding circuit files ==="
fd -e js -e ts "circuit" "src/simulator/src"

echo -e "\n=== Checking for Scope in circuit files ==="
# Use broader search patterns for exports
rg -l "(?:export|class|type|interface).*Scope" "src/simulator/src"

Length of output: 1076


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the Scope implementation in circuit.ts
echo "=== Scope implementation in circuit.ts ==="
rg -A 2 "(?:export|class|type|interface).*Scope" "src/simulator/src/circuit.ts"

# Also check if it's the default export
echo -e "\n=== Default export in circuit.ts ==="
rg "export default" "src/simulator/src/circuit.ts"

Length of output: 1106


13-16: Verify SimulatorStore type definitions

The implementation looks correct, but let's ensure the SimulatorStore's type definitions are properly set up for TypeScript.

✅ Verification successful

Type definitions for SimulatorStore are properly configured

The store is well-typed with proper TypeScript definitions. The dialogBox.saveimage_dialog is correctly defined as a boolean property in the state interface.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check SimulatorStore type definitions
rg -t ts "interface.*SimulatorStore|type.*SimulatorStore|class.*SimulatorStore" "src"

# Check dialogBox property definition
rg -t ts "dialogBox.*:.*{.*saveimage_dialog" "src"

Length of output: 267


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find SimulatorStore implementation file
fd -e ts -e tsx SimulatorStore

# Find imports and usage
rg -t ts "import.*SimulatorStore|from.*SimulatorStore"

# Search for dialogBox property
rg -t ts "dialogBox.*[:=]"

# Use ast-grep to find type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
  dialogBox: $_;
}'

Length of output: 1098


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check state.ts content
cat src/store/SimulatorStore/state.ts

# Find any type definitions for dialogBox
rg -t ts "type.*DialogBox|interface.*DialogBox"

# Look for saveimage_dialog type definition
rg -t ts "saveimage_dialog.*:"

Length of output: 2587

@ThatDeparted2061
Copy link
Author

ThatDeparted2061 commented Jan 22, 2025

cc @niladrix719
Wud love to hear for improvements

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant