Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
TLDR. I don't think so. I'd like to keep us backward compatible on this. tox 4 want to be a breaking change for just a small margine of cases, things which are deprecated for years.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As tox4 is already counting as a breaking change, I would like to propose making
tox -a
andtox -l
more like they do when-v
is also present.This is primary because the description feature is unknown to most tox users, i found even veterans being pleasantly surprised about discovering it.
I know that the reason why this was done like this was to keep the output machine parsable but I think we have two options that could help here:
tox -vq
is machine parsable and document it as workaroundThe idea is to make the default output more informative to the users, by default. Verbosity is supposed to be used for debugging, not for essential information.
IMHO, replacing
with description if verbose
could be replaced withwithout description if quiet
in order to improve options discoverability for users.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions