You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, this is a really wonderful try in rust. But for a DL user I mainly focus only on some core functions like:
resize
cvtColor
video open/write
image open/write
So, just wonder, how does the performance compare with opencv? for example, the resize sometimes is non-crutial since it time-costing ,in opencv, it using SIMD for accelerations, does cv able to do so?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cv is currently more like a collection of various crates with glue to make them work together in addition to MVG primitives and algorithms. The ndarray-vision crate is where some of the image processing algorithms live. You also will find some in image and imageproc. Those two are not maintained by us, but I would look at their repo to see how they are doing it. I believe ndarray, which we are currently using for image processing of this sort, does have some SIMD support.
I would not consider cv to be useful for you if you are doing only image processing. Use the crates I mentioned above. cv is currently really only useful for MVG algorithms, and even then only a limited subset. I haven't had much time recently to maintain everything, so some of the dependencies are likely out of date as well. Best of luck!
Hi, this is a really wonderful try in rust. But for a DL user I mainly focus only on some core functions like:
So, just wonder, how does the performance compare with opencv? for example, the resize sometimes is non-crutial since it time-costing ,in opencv, it using SIMD for accelerations, does cv able to do so?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: