You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Technically speaking, an extension may be able to ship and use more than one shared object file simply by referring to other files in the SQL scripts' create function statements.
Now, of course, control files don't support this notion, having a singular module_pathname.
What do you think about this? Should multiple shared objects per extension be considered a valid case at all? If so, should control files support this notion?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Technically speaking, an extension may be able to ship and use more than one shared object file simply by referring to other files in the SQL scripts'
create function
statements.Now, of course, control files don't support this notion, having a singular
module_pathname
.What do you think about this? Should multiple shared objects per extension be considered a valid case at all? If so, should control files support this notion?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions