Metanorma
-
|
What exactly is causing this? I have 11 of them processing my rfc draft. The first seems to be related to this text which is at the end of an included file:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Thank you @douglm and apologies for getting back to you so late. Missed the notification on this one obviously! Could you point us out to the source so we can debug this? I believe the "hanging paragraph" warning means that there is a particular paragraph that cannot be uniquely referred to as a clause. A hanging paragraph is considered poor practice and hence raises a warning because of this reason. e.g. == Clause 1
This is a hanging paragraph.
=== Clause 1.1
The above paragraph is considered "hanging" because "Clause 1" refers
to the entire Clause 1 (which contains Clause 1.1); the "hanging paragraph"
does not have a unique reference. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That is correct, and that is a good practice warning that derives from ISO, but which we believe should apply to standards in general, given how important citeability is for them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thank you @douglm and apologies for getting back to you so late. Missed the notification on this one obviously!
Could you point us out to the source so we can debug this?
I believe the "hanging paragraph" warning means that there is a particular paragraph that cannot be uniquely referred to as a clause. A hanging paragraph is considered poor practice and hence raises a warning because of this reason.
e.g.