Information Architecture update - code snippet / API documentation #351
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
Created an epic for the work needed. We should discuss how to tackle this here, though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here's the Google Doc we're working from. https://docs.google.com/document/d/11ewbiDJ8vG0Xar1hA2XnMuM_4dARGi9sToHm29S4dIw/edit |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A discussion about changes to the ux.redhat.com website IA.
Also, there might be a need for a Contribute section
Git link in the masthead Landing page could have a "contribute" band of sorts Should the contribute link go directly to how to contribute documentation in github rather then on ux. itself? Again if we are using that as a starting point for everything?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Discussion about nav titles from chat There was discussion about the proposed component page nav titles: The
The
Benny said that he wasn't sure about
He preferred to change Other ideas instead of
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can we make a clear distinction in our new IA between "components" (i.e. web components) and "patterns"? We need to document the design for patterns that we don't and will not implement as web components. To group them all together under "components" (as we do now) is confusing. Some components also have associated patterns ("here's the footer web component, here's the footer pattern") - I think it's OK and even preferable to document those separately |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Objective
Advance and update the information architecture of ux.redhat.com for designer and developer guidance and development needs.
Request & Considerations
- For instance:
elements/ rh-footer/docs/design.njk
elements/ rh-footer/docs/styles.njk
elements/rh-footer/docs/usage.njk
elements/rh-footer/docs/overview.njk
elements/rh-footer/docs/ accessibility.njk
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions