You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm currently delving into robot path planning and have noticed an intriguing behavior during the process, which involves conducting two distinct searches: one without a validator and another with a validator. During the second search, where the validator is present, I observed that the cost for each waypoint in the queue is incremented by 1, regardless of whether a conflict is detected.
As a beginner in this field, I might be missing some fundamental understanding of why this is the case. Could someone kindly explain the rationale behind this cost incrementation during the search with a validator? Is this a standard practice in path planning to account for certain factors, or could there be another explanation?
I appreciate any insights you can provide. Please excuse me if my question seems naive; I'm eager to learn and understand more about this fascinating topic.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello, open-rmf community,
I'm currently delving into robot path planning and have noticed an intriguing behavior during the process, which involves conducting two distinct searches: one without a validator and another with a validator. During the second search, where the validator is present, I observed that the cost for each waypoint in the queue is incremented by 1, regardless of whether a conflict is detected.
As a beginner in this field, I might be missing some fundamental understanding of why this is the case. Could someone kindly explain the rationale behind this cost incrementation during the search with a validator? Is this a standard practice in path planning to account for certain factors, or could there be another explanation?
I appreciate any insights you can provide. Please excuse me if my question seems naive; I'm eager to learn and understand more about this fascinating topic.
Thank you very much!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions