Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for multihoming is missing #28

Open
tuexen opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Support for multihoming is missing #28

tuexen opened this issue Aug 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tuexen
Copy link
Contributor

tuexen commented Aug 5, 2015

The peer of the SUT needs to support multiple address. It must be possible to specify the remote addresses for injected and sniffed packets. This is required for sctp-d-v-8-10 and sctp-rt-i-11-3, sctp-as-v-1-11-1, sctp-as-v-1-11-2, and sctp-as-i-1-15.

@tuexen tuexen self-assigned this Aug 5, 2015
@tuexen tuexen added this to the ETSI Conformance Test suite milestone Aug 5, 2015
@suryag10
Copy link

Hi,
Any update on this.

@tuexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tuexen commented Mar 26, 2022

A student of mine is working in it...

@suryag10
Copy link

Thx @tuexen , By any chance can i have a inprogress one atleast for the sctp-rt-i-11-3. If possible i will try and contribute back as well.

@tuexen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tuexen commented Mar 26, 2022

The support for multihoming will hit the tree, when it is ready. Can't give a precise ETA. Then adopting the tests should be simple and will be done almost immediately.

If you have an urgent need for testing, you could use sctp-tests, which is an implementation of the ETSI testsuite based on stt. I use that whenever doing black box testing.

@suryag10
Copy link

Thx @tuexen for the inputs. Will give it a try.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants