Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISO STS: Numbering restarted in multiple lists inside bibliography #799

Open
Intelligent2013 opened this issue Sep 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement sts NISO STS compatibility

Comments

@Intelligent2013
Copy link
Contributor

Source tickets: metanorma/mnconvert#190, metanorma/mnconvert#207

Guidelines for coding IEC and ISO standards in NISOSTS provides multiple lists inside bibliography with restarted numbering (see page 30):

image

NISO STS XML fragment:

<ref-list content-type="bibl" id="sec_bibl">
	<title>Bibliography</title>
	<ref-list>
		<title>ISO standards</title>
		<ref id="biblref_1_1">
			<label>[1]</label>....</ref>
		<ref id="biblref_1_2">
			<label>[2]</label>....</ref>
	</ref-list>
	<ref-list>
		<title>Other Publications</title>
		<ref id="biblref_1_3">
			<label>[1]</label>....</ref>
		<ref id="biblref_1_4">
			<label>[2]</label>....</ref>
	</ref-list>

Currently, Metanorma supports multiple Bibliography sub-sections (https://www.metanorma.org/author/topics/document-format/bibliography/#general, See EXAMPLE 2. EXAMPLE OF HAVING MULTIPLE BIBLIOGRAPHY SUB-SECTIONS), but sub-sections have continuous numbering.

Can we achieve restarted numbering?

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

I am really surprised here, and I am VERY reluctant to implement this: if [1] is how you reference a bibliographic citation, having [1] be ambiguous is a catastrophe. That usage is only acceptable if [1] is never used to reference the bibliographic citation (because the standard identifier is used instead)—which means that only standards are being referenced. If it was a book, you would still use [1].

I can do this. Do not assume that I will. I will need to investigate what this means for referencing. I will never implement something that makes citations ambiguous.

@opoudjis opoudjis moved this from 🆕 New to 🏔 High priority in Metanorma Sep 19, 2022
@ronaldtse ronaldtse changed the title Numbering restarted in multiple lists inside bibliography ISO STS: Numbering restarted in multiple lists inside bibliography Sep 19, 2022
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

@opoudjis @Intelligent2013 This is definitely not a high priority task. Let's consider this a "noted issue" and we will deal with this when we encounter such an example.

@ronaldtse ronaldtse added sts NISO STS compatibility and removed question labels Sep 19, 2022
@ronaldtse ronaldtse moved this from 🏔 High priority to 🏝 Low priority in Metanorma Sep 19, 2022
@opoudjis opoudjis removed this from Metanorma Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement sts NISO STS compatibility
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants