You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am really surprised here, and I am VERY reluctant to implement this: if [1] is how you reference a bibliographic citation, having [1] be ambiguous is a catastrophe. That usage is only acceptable if [1] is never used to reference the bibliographic citation (because the standard identifier is used instead)—which means that only standards are being referenced. If it was a book, you would still use [1].
I can do this. Do not assume that I will. I will need to investigate what this means for referencing. I will never implement something that makes citations ambiguous.
ronaldtse
changed the title
Numbering restarted in multiple lists inside bibliography
ISO STS: Numbering restarted in multiple lists inside bibliography
Sep 19, 2022
@opoudjis@Intelligent2013 This is definitely not a high priority task. Let's consider this a "noted issue" and we will deal with this when we encounter such an example.
Source tickets: metanorma/mnconvert#190, metanorma/mnconvert#207
Guidelines for coding IEC and ISO standards in NISOSTS provides multiple lists inside bibliography with restarted numbering (see page
30
):NISO STS XML fragment:
Currently, Metanorma supports multiple Bibliography sub-sections (https://www.metanorma.org/author/topics/document-format/bibliography/#general, See
EXAMPLE 2. EXAMPLE OF HAVING MULTIPLE BIBLIOGRAPHY SUB-SECTIONS
), but sub-sections have continuous numbering.Can we achieve restarted numbering?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: