Encoding "Terms and definitions" sub-sections in Amendments

[manuelfuenmayor]

The format of a "Terms and definitions" sub-section is different to the rest.

From ISO 8601 Amendment 1:

We need a way to encode the type of sub-sections for Amendments.

This is a sample of the current encoding method we've been using:

[change=add,locality="clause=3.1.2.16"]
== 3.1.2

Add the following terminological entries after 3.1.2.13:

[change=add,locality="clause=3.1.2.14"]
== 3.1.2.14 canonical form
autonumber:example[1]
autonumber:termnote[1]

date and time expression where all its time scale components are _normalised_
(3.1.2.15)

[NOTE%termnote]
The canonical form of a date and time expression implies it contains minimal
underflow and no overflow.

Which renders:

This issue relates to #1251

[ronaldtse]

I've added a link to the document (this is now published) where this occurs:

• https://github.com/CalConnect/iso-8601-2-amd1/

[opoudjis]

The amend syntax currently provides the replacement text as a blockquote. This will not work when the replacement text is an entire clause, as that violates the syntactic constraint on well-nested clauses: an alternate syntax will be needed for clauses as replacement text.

Note that any such clausal replacement text will need to be "deactivated" with regard to interacting with numbering, and possibly even depth calculation for titles: they may be syntactically subclauses, but they need to be inert with regard to interacting with the remainder of the document.