compilationLevel ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS

[wowoName]

I had a problem when using ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS to build again. I want properties and methods in a class in java not to be confused Delete how I set them. Thank you very much

[mP1]

I want properties and methods in a class in java not to be confused Delete how I set them. Thank you very much

Are you trying to access the same properties/fields from your "java class" by javascript ?

https://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsJsInterop.html

[wowoName]

No. Instead, it's stored in a map in another class.

…

---Original--- From: "Miroslav ***@***.***> Date: Mon, Apr 29, 2024 19:29 PM To: ***@***.***>; Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>; Subject: Re: [mP1/j2cl-maven-plugin] compilationLevel ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS(Issue #660) I want properties and methods in a class in java not to be confused Delete how I set them. Thank you very much Are you trying to access the same properties/fields from your "java class" by javascript ? https://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsJsInterop.html — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[mP1]

Im not quite sure what your problem is, i dont understand exactly what "confused Delete how i set them" means.

[wowoName]

I'm sorry I wasn't accurate, but here's what my code looks like。
This code should work in the browser console

But when I call the 'getSideName' method in 'ActiveUnitAgent' through the call console with the data I got in step 1, it doesn't work.
code:
clientCore.getActiveUnits()[0].getSideName();

How should I modify it? Thank you very much！！！

[wowoName]

[mP1]

Sounds like perhaps you have discovered some sort of Closure bug.

But first, within the browser debugger can you paste all the properties on the ActiveUnitAgent object itself when the debugger fails. Just wondering if the object is actually a ActiveUnitAgent in this scope. You did confirm it works fine without ADVANCED - so theoretically it should just work if understand whats happened.

[wowoName]

Changing to SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS using compile mode will work fine. After the search data can be exported in the.js file by the desired method can work。
goog.exportSymbol('ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getUnitClass', ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getUnitClass);

Is there any other easy way to derive the desired method instead of listing it

[wowoName]

Changing to SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS using compile mode will work fine. After the search data can be exported in the.js file by the desired method can work。
goog.exportSymbol('ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getUnitClass', ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getUnitClass);

Is there any other easy way to derive the desired method instead of listing it

[mP1]

Changing to SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS using compile mode will work fine. After the search data can be exported in the.js file by the desired method can work。
goog.exportSymbol('ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getUnitClass', ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getUnitClass);

Q1. did you add the goog.exportSymbol now ?
Q2: Is it working now ?

Is there any other easy way to derive the desired method instead of listing it
I was hoping you can confirm if the object is actually a ActiveUnitAgent by looking a the other props, so we can understand if the sideName is the only problem.

[mP1]

How did you fix your problem ?

[wowoName]

Changing to SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS is more reliable when compiling mode。
Or export the method you want to call in.js
goog.exportSymbol('ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getSideName', ActiveUnitAgent.prototype.getSideName);