Replies: 17 comments
-
CI? I'll have to install windows somewhere, won't I? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Was thinking of using appveyor |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is there anything you need help with here? Apart from appveyor, I have only ever used Github Actions and they were easy to set up. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just need to find time to tackle the stupid errors that prevent other test to compile. Appveyor is setup already. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It looks like some compile time traits we have don't fly properly but the error messages are outrageous. I will push a more up-to-date list of breaking thing later today. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So mostly we need help understanding why msvc don't understand our properly standard templatr monstrosity |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sure, sounds like something I can investigate. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Good. Let me update this issue later withore info |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@Tradias added a small roadmap on how to tackle the thing. Tell me if you need help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
unit.api targets
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looks good, I have managed to get |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Good job wow :D |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I didn't know about #1458, one of the issue was in fact related. I think my solution might be faster to compile but potentially incorrect. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I had the same code at one point but it failed on other compilers. Maybe we can borrow your cocnept based strategy but lay it out like ours ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes that is possible. I have reverted it to your version for now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Merged the CI adaptation to see if it is faster to compiles |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
May i could help? (I'm currently integrate kiwaku +eve for an image processing project and i will really appreciate msvc support for EVE) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is a mutable, ongoing issue to discuss/list steps for proper MSVC support.
Current Status
Since MSVC 2022 19.30, C++20 support has drastically improved. Building blocks libraries like kumi and raberu now natively compile on MSVC without any hassle. This has triggered the investigation of how much EVE needs to be fixed to make MSVC EVE a thing.
Note that we currently don't care about code generation quality as our first goal here is to get the library to compile.
Plan of Actions
We need to use our module based tests system to validate EVE code on MSVC independant piece after the next.
This is the ordered list of module to make pass:
unit.api.exe
unit.memory.exe
unit.core.exe
unit.math.exe
unit.algo.exe
unit.views.exe
doc.exe
Best process so far:
#if #else #endif
whenever possibleMSVC also produces a lot of obnoxious warning for conversions. Some are really stupid IMHO but try to fix them
as best as we can unless it makes the code ugly.
Current Status
unit.arch.exe
compiles, pass tests and validate CIunit.meta.exe
compiles and pass tests and validate CIunit.internals.exe
compiles and pass tests and validate CIBeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions