You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there a reason why the output (both for the column and the table mask) has 3 channels? The training is basically doing binary classification (which also means the mask does not need to be of dtype float32, but that's another matter) so we could work with either 2 output channels (those being the logits for "belongs to the table/column or not") or even just one channel (which modulo applying the sigmoid-function would give the probability that a pixel belongs to the table/column).
Since the labels contain only zeros and ones the third channel should get arbitrarily small values after training long enough anyway.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there a reason why the output (both for the column and the table mask) has 3 channels? The training is basically doing binary classification (which also means the mask does not need to be of dtype float32, but that's another matter) so we could work with either 2 output channels (those being the logits for "belongs to the table/column or not") or even just one channel (which modulo applying the sigmoid-function would give the probability that a pixel belongs to the table/column).
Since the labels contain only zeros and ones the third channel should get arbitrarily small values after training long enough anyway.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: