From 3b4dacf2ede0dafbcf942ac696439237f8b31dc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:09:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Let the docs of base_label and label be similar

---
 vm_backtrace.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/vm_backtrace.c b/vm_backtrace.c
index 9f004df7920a83..11b26adbf49781 100644
--- a/vm_backtrace.c
+++ b/vm_backtrace.c
@@ -287,15 +287,14 @@ location_label(rb_backtrace_location_t *loc)
  *	    1.times do
  *	      puts caller_locations(0).first.label
  *	    end
- *
  *	  end
  *	end
  *
  * The result of calling +foo+ is this:
  *
- *	label: foo
- *	label: block in foo
- *	label: block (2 levels) in foo
+ *	foo
+ *	block in foo
+ *	block (2 levels) in foo
  *
  */
 static VALUE
@@ -315,10 +314,28 @@ location_base_label(rb_backtrace_location_t *loc)
 }
 
 /*
- * Returns the label of this frame without decoration.
+ * Returns the base label of this frame, which is usually equal to the label,
+ * without decoration.
+ *
+ * Consider the following example:
+ *
+ *	def foo
+ *	  puts caller_locations(0).first.base_label
+ *
+ *	  1.times do
+ *	    puts caller_locations(0).first.base_label
+ *
+ *	    1.times do
+ *	      puts caller_locations(0).first.base_label
+ *	    end
+ *	  end
+ *	end
+ *
+ * The result of calling +foo+ is this:
  *
- * For example, if the label is `foo`, this method returns `foo` as well, but if
- * the label is +rescue in foo+, this method returns just +foo+.
+ *	foo
+ *	foo
+ *	foo
  */
 static VALUE
 location_base_label_m(VALUE self)