You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
See the Cache-on-second-hit rule section in Section 4.2 of this Akamai paper.
Most content is only ever requested once(~75% as per the paper). If some content is popular, it will be accessed atleast twice and persisting only such content in the cache improves the cache hit ratio and reduces disk IO/cache-churn on the nodes.
Once an L2 decides to persist some content in it's cache, the L2 should escape to the IPFS Gateway and cache it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
aarshkshah1992
changed the title
L2s should hydrate their persistent cache asynchronously from IPFS Gateway
L2s should follow the cache on second miss rule and hydrate their persistent cache asynchronously from IPFS Gateway
Jun 20, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
See the
Cache-on-second-hit rule
section in Section 4.2 of this Akamai paper.Most content is only ever requested once(~75% as per the paper). If some content is popular, it will be accessed atleast twice and persisting only such content in the cache improves the cache hit ratio and reduces disk IO/cache-churn on the nodes.
Once an L2 decides to persist some content in it's cache, the L2 should escape to the IPFS Gateway and cache it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: