You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Initially, I believed that C++ containers posed fewer challenges compared to C++ IO. However, my perspective has shifted after working with fast_io.
Contrary to my previous assumption, C++ containers present significant issues, particularly in compatibility with fast_io. Numerous examples highlight this:
Not Freestanding C++ containers lack the freestanding capability necessary for integration with fast_io. Microsoft's Flawed Implementation of std::deque MSVC STL mishandles std::deque, which is actually a crucial and faster container than vector for push_back operations and iteration. This results in overall performance degradation. Restrictive Allocator Model The allocator model's type constraints prevent containers from efficiently merging different types at the binary level. Inefficient Implementation of list The presence of size() in the list container renders it practically useless in certain scenarios. Absence of B-tree The lack of a built-in B-tree structure limits the versatility and efficiency of C++ containers. Lack of Ranked Tree Support Ranked tree functionality is notably absent, further limiting the capabilities of C++ containers. Exception Handling Overuse Overreliance on exception handling for error management complicates container usage. Pointless Features like pmr Features like pmr (polymorphic memory resources) prove to be convoluted and offer minimal practical utility, adding unnecessary complexity. Absence of Interface For instance, while vector lacks a method like push_back_unchecked, deque lacks a mechanism to access its internal buckets directly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Initially, I believed that C++ containers posed fewer challenges compared to C++ IO. However, my perspective has shifted after working with fast_io.
Contrary to my previous assumption, C++ containers present significant issues, particularly in compatibility with fast_io. Numerous examples highlight this:
Not Freestanding C++ containers lack the freestanding capability necessary for integration with fast_io.
Microsoft's Flawed Implementation of
std::deque
MSVC STL mishandlesstd::deque
, which is actually a crucial and faster container than vector forpush_back
operations and iteration. This results in overall performance degradation.Restrictive Allocator Model The allocator model's type constraints prevent containers from efficiently merging different types at the binary level.
Inefficient Implementation of list The presence of size() in the list container renders it practically useless in certain scenarios.
Absence of B-tree The lack of a built-in B-tree structure limits the versatility and efficiency of C++ containers.
Lack of Ranked Tree Support Ranked tree functionality is notably absent, further limiting the capabilities of C++ containers.
Exception Handling Overuse Overreliance on exception handling for error management complicates container usage.
Pointless Features like pmr Features like pmr (polymorphic memory resources) prove to be convoluted and offer minimal practical utility, adding unnecessary complexity.
Absence of Interface For instance, while vector lacks a method like push_back_unchecked, deque lacks a mechanism to access its internal buckets directly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: