-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Request] Area of Improvements for Documentation #1407
Comments
The schema evolution on the struct is incorrect in the pyiceberg api documention Schema evolution. It says that to use dot formatting "<struct_name>.<field_name>", but this is incorrect. It should be given as a tuple ("<struct_name>", "<field_name>"). |
@jeppe-dos thanks for reporting this! Is this something you would like to contribute? |
Just having an authoritative page that lists all supported catalogs would be nice. According to various pages in https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/1.7.1/, looks like there are multiple options:
This is probably not exhaustive. Not all of these are listed in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/f40ec2096bc078b9fd2b59d6beb32cd77e371ac4/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/CatalogUtil.java#L69-L74 , which makes it all even more confusing. |
Yes, I have made a PR:
Yes. I have made a pull request here: #1433 |
Feature Request / Improvement
The PyIceberg documentation is currently lagging behind its feature set. I’m starting this issue to track community feedback on areas that need improvement and to encourage contributors to collaborate in enhancing the documentation.
Improvements could include refining existing documentation, adding more examples for specific features, or creating a cookbook (similar to issue #1201).
The current documentation can be found at the following locations:
Here's a list of possible improvements that are in my backlog. I'll add to this list as more requests come in.
Improvements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: