You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With two (almost three) repository types supported now, I think it beyond the time when we should have made an abstract class for a repository type.
We can create the concrete classes for each repository, and iterate over those, instead of having functions which handle each repository type in an ad-hoc way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With two (almost three) repository types supported now, I think it beyond the time when we should have made an abstract class for a repository type.
We can create the concrete classes for each repository, and iterate over those, instead of having functions which handle each repository type in an ad-hoc way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: