Integrate NDISAPI, An Alternative for Tun (Windows) #4228
Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
|
I want to try it |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
PR is welcomed |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
我没理解错的话这两种方式都被 Windows Packet Filter Driver 所支持，不过我刚刚看了下这个 Driver 严格来说不是免费的，我觉得自己弄个虚拟网卡再用 gVisor 来处理流量并不难 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
不过我还没研究怎么做到区分进程的，我觉得仅虚拟网卡似乎不能区分进程？ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Do you mean, how to bypass xray-core traffic to not to go through NDIS? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@amir-devman 差不多，我猜应该有某种机制在传递文件路径 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, I've already implemented the tools to bypass traffic of certain processes (which this can allow you to bypass itself process - auto route) using path or .exe filename. That's done by doing some |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I would like to propose the integration of NDISAPI into Xray-core as an alternative to the TUN driver for Windows users.
Why NDISAPI?
NDISAPI is a high-performance packet filtering framework for Windows. Benchmarks on WireSock.net demonstrate that NDISAPI outperforms traditional TUN implementations, including WireGuard TUN, in terms of throughput and CPU efficiency. Integrating NDISAPI into Xray-core could provide users with a significant performance boost, especially for high-speed or resource-constrained scenarios.
Benefits of NDISAPI Integration:
Superior Performance: Lower CPU utilization and higher throughput compared to TUN.
Advanced Features: Direct control of packet routing, filtering, and modification at the driver level, enabling more efficient traffic management.
Optimized for Windows: NDISAPI is specifically designed for Windows, making it a natural choice for enhancing the performance and flexibility of Xray-core on this platform.
Proposal Details
I have already developed a Go implementation of NDISAPI, which is ready to integrate into projects like Xray-core. I am also willing to personally implement and maintain this feature through a PR.
Community Feedback
Before proceeding, I would like to gather feedback from the maintainers and the community:
Would this feature align with Xray-core’s goals and priorities?
Are there any specific concerns or prerequisites to consider for implementing this feature?
I believe this integration could greatly benefit Windows users of Xray-core by providing a powerful and efficient alternative to TUN. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and engaging in a constructive discussion!
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions