We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
目前RT-Thread的方式,在开发的时候会变成更多以BSP为主的方式,而对于工程业务逻辑,当不需要过多关注板卡情况时,并不是那么友好。而当所有构建脚本都使用scons脚本,Python脚本时,会太编程化(灵活度足够高,但不利于IDE、UI工具配置模式)
希望可以做到:
目前在RT-Thread的一些BSP中,也引入了SDK_LIB,链接脚本,输出产物名称也都统一,这些都会在一定层面影响到统一化支持。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
想法说明
目前RT-Thread的方式,在开发的时候会变成更多以BSP为主的方式,而对于工程业务逻辑,当不需要过多关注板卡情况时,并不是那么友好。而当所有构建脚本都使用scons脚本,Python脚本时,会太编程化(灵活度足够高,但不利于IDE、UI工具配置模式)
希望可以做到:
挑战
目前在RT-Thread的一些BSP中,也引入了SDK_LIB,链接脚本,输出产物名称也都统一,这些都会在一定层面影响到统一化支持。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: