You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even after #242, there are still places in which we could make use of an EvolutionPoint (i.e. it would be the conceptually correct object), but we keep passing just a scale, and optionally a number of flavors (optionally both because it may default to None, but even because we may not allow for it at all).
where clearly (scale_to, nf_to) = target: EvolutionPoint.
This propagates down to the Atlas, that sometimes has to deal with an unspecified number of flavors, and it is the reason for the Atlas.normalize() function.
Even after #242, there are still places in which we could make use of an
EvolutionPoint
(i.e. it would be the conceptually correct object), but we keep passing just a scale, and optionally a number of flavors (optionally both because it may default toNone
, but even because we may not allow for it at all).E.g.
eko/src/eko/couplings.py
Lines 712 to 716 in 431a055
where clearly
(scale_to, nf_to) = target: EvolutionPoint
.This propagates down to the
Atlas
, that sometimes has to deal with an unspecified number of flavors, and it is the reason for theAtlas.normalize()
function.eko/src/eko/matchings.py
Line 66 in 431a055
eko/src/eko/matchings.py
Line 139 in 431a055
EvolutionPoint
s consistentlyeko.couplings
andeko.msbar_masses
Atlas.normalize()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: