Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Improve voice over labels and actions #726

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

laevandus
Copy link
Contributor

@laevandus laevandus commented Jan 22, 2025

🔗 Issue Link

Resolves IOS-641

🎯 Goal

Improve voice over by hiding decorative images, adding missing labels, and accessibility actions

🛠 Implementation

Reviewed common views with a focus on decorative images, confusing or missing labels, and adding accessibility actions for cases we have used tap gestures only. This PR just focused on before mentioned areas for making the basic usage better.

🧪 Testing

🎨 Changes

Add relevant screenshots or videos showcasing the changes.

☑️ Checklist

  • I have signed the Stream CLA (required)
  • Changelog is updated with client-facing changes
  • New code is covered by unit tests
  • Affected documentation updated (docusaurus, tutorial, CMS (task created)

@laevandus laevandus requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 08:13
@Stream-SDK-Bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Stream-SDK-Bot commented Jan 22, 2025

SDK Size

title develop branch diff status
StreamChatSwiftUI 7.55 MB 7.58 MB +32 KB 🟢

@laevandus laevandus changed the title [WIP] Improve voice over labels and navigation [WIP] Improve voice over labels and actions Jan 22, 2025
@@ -526,6 +527,7 @@ public struct DateIndicatorView: View {
.padding(.all, 8)
Spacer()
}
.accessibilityAddTraits(.isHeader)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

VO reads: "22 Jan, header". Otherwise it would be hard to know what the date is about.

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
69.2% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Contributor

@martinmitrevski martinmitrevski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Seems like some of the e2e tests broke though, pls check this before merging.

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ public struct SendMessageButton: View {
)
}
.disabled(!enabled)
.accessibilityAddTraits(.isButton)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we remove the trait?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants