Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kinematic air viscosity #217

Open
simone-silvestri opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Kinematic air viscosity #217

simone-silvestri opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@simone-silvestri
Copy link

I was searching for some way to calculate the kinematic viscosity based on temperature and or humidity.
Is there any plans to add a simplified viscosity law?

I guess something simplified that depends on temperature like Sutherland's law might be enough, I am not sure how much humidity might play a role though

@trontrytel
Copy link
Member

So far I only used it as constant. Do other models consider the temperature dependence?

@simone-silvestri
Copy link
Author

I was looking at the implementation of the COARE3.6 algorithm and it looks like they are using a temperature-dependent viscosity.

However, it looks like in typical atmospheric conditions the viscosity does not change more than 60 - 70%. A constant viscosity is probably totally fine...

@trontrytel
Copy link
Member

Should we add it as an option so that you can test if it makes a difference? It's empirical, right? I don't have any intuition on if those differences would be important for your application, or for CloudMicrophysics.jl for that matter. I can test it in CM.jl if you think thats useful.

Assuming t is in Celsius(?) Those are the numbers I was getting. Our default is 1.6e-5 so we are around the warm temperature end there.

Screenshot 2024-04-30 at 10 19 33 AM

@glwagner
Copy link
Member

I think it's mostly important for reproducing COARE3.6. More generally I don't think it's super important; it comes into play when diagnosing roughness lengths at very low wind speeds over the ocean --- low enough that the fluxes predicted by the Charnock relation are less than what would be predicted for a laminar boundary layer over a smooth wall.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants